Alan Armstrong
RepublicanU.S. Senator, OK| Age | 63 (b. 1962-07-11) |
| Gender | Male |
| In office since | 2026-03-24 (~0 yrs) |
| Education | B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Oklahoma (1985). Raised in Bartlesville, Oklahoma, where he graduated from Sooner High School. |
| Prior occupation | Oil and gas executive; President and CEO of The Williams Companies (2011-2025) and Executive Chairman of its Board (2025-2026); began at Williams as an engineer in 1986 |
| Military service | No |
| Birthplace | McLennan County, Texas |
| Marital status | Married — Shelly Armstrong |
| Children | 4 |
| Residence | Tulsa, Oklahoma |
Pending research: race / ethnicity · religion · languages · notable relatives · openly lgbtq.
Career & politics
| First elected | 2026 (appointed, never elected) |
| Committees | Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP); Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety; Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security · Senate Committee on Indian Affairs |
| Ideology | Republican; appointed by Gov. Kevin Stitt; described as strongly aligned with President Trump on energy policy, with energy permitting reform as his stated top priority |
Financial
Net worth: estimate
| The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) common stock | stock · $113,000,000–$113,000,000 · 2026 |
Scandals & crimes ledger
resolved — Court finding of spoliation of evidence (deletion of personal Gmail account) in Williams v. Energy Transfer merger litigation
During the failed 2015-2016 merger between The Williams Companies (where Armstrong was CEO) and Energy Transfer Equity (ETE), ETE accused Armstrong of using a personal Gmail account to undermine the board-supported deal and of deleting that account two days after a 2016 deposition. In its December 29, 2021 post-trial opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery (Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III) found that 'Armstrong's destruction of his Gmail account was spoliation of evidence,' rejected his stated reason as not credible, and imposed a monetary sanction on Armstrong personally rather than an adverse inference. This was a formal court finding against Armstrong as an individual within a case his company ultimately won; on October 10, 2023 the Delaware Supreme Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the Court of Chancery's opinions (Energy Transfer, LP v. The Williams Companies, Inc., No. 391, 2022).