check.republican

← roster

Bernie Moreno

Bernie Moreno

RepublicanU.S. Senator, OH
Age59 (b. 1967-02-14)
GenderMale
In office since2025-01-03 (~1 yrs)
Race / ethnicityHispanic/Latino (Colombian American)
ReligionRoman Catholic
EducationPinecrest Academy, Florida (1985); B.A./B.B.A. in business, University of Michigan (1989). His campaign acknowledged that biographical materials and a 2011 dealership application falsely claimed he held an MBA from Michigan; the university confirmed he received only a bachelor's degree.
Prior occupationAuto dealership owner/executive (Collection Auto Group / Bernie Moreno Companies, more than a dozen dealerships in Ohio and elsewhere); earlier worked for General Motors/Saturn; later founded blockchain technology company Ownum
Military serviceNo
BirthplaceBogotá, Colombia (foreign-born)
LanguagesEnglish; Spanish (native, born in Colombia)
Marital statusMarried — Bridget Brickley
Children4
ResidenceWestlake, Ohio
Notable relativesBrother Luis Alberto Moreno, former Colombian Ambassador to the U.S. and former president of the Inter-American Development Bank; cousin Lina Moreno de Uribe, former First Lady of Colombia

Pending research: openly lgbtq.

Career & politics

First elected2024
CommitteesBanking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Budget · Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Party historyRepublican. Was a sharp public critic of Donald Trump in 2016 (called him a 'lunatic' and said he voted for Marco Rubio in the primary) but became a Trump ally and endorsee by 2023-2024; no party affiliation switch reported.
IdeologyConservative Republican; pro-Trump; described as a hardline conservative on immigration and a cryptocurrency advocate
Signature legislationExclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 (S.3283) - would require dual citizens to renounce other citizenship

Financial

Net worth: disclosed $44,151,065–$250,028,996 (2024) · estimate

Unimproved land, Sunbury, Ohioreal_estate · $5,000,001–$25,000,000 · 2024
Home, Ocean Reef, Floridareal_estate · $5,000,001–$25,000,000 · 2024
Condo, Coconut Grove, Floridareal_estate · $5,000,001–$25,000,000 · 2024
Additional unimproved land, Sunbury, Ohioreal_estate · $5,000,001–$25,000,000 · 2024
M Motors Group, Inc. (non-public corporate securities)business_owned · $5,000,001–$25,000,000 · 2024

Top donors: Defend American Jobs (cryptocurrency-affiliated super PAC, tied to Fairshake/Coinbase/Ripple) (More than $40 million in outside spending supporting his 2024 campaign)

Top industries: Cryptocurrency/digital assets · Securities & investment · Real estate · Automotive · Retired

Scandals & crimes ledger

resolved (disputed)Civil Lawsuit — Herb Chambers Companies v. Moreno (Misappropriation of Confidential Business Data / Breach of Confidentiality Agreement) business
financial/corruption · 2005-07-01 · Herb Chambers Companies, Moreno's former employer where he had risen through management from 1993 to 2005, sued Moreno in Middlesex County, Massachusetts in July 2005, shortly after Moreno left to acquire his own Mercedes-Benz dealership in North Olmsted, Ohio. The suit alleged Moreno misappropriated confidential company data and used Chambers' business resources to poach customers, claiming he sold roughly 20 cars through his new dealership to former Chambers customers in violation of a confidentiality agreement, and that he improperly advertised his Ohio dealership in Massachusetts. Moreno contested the suit. Reporting indicates the litigation ended in a settlement that was later overturned, though the exact final disposition and any monetary terms have not been publicly detailed. · Litigation reportedly ended in a settlement that was later overturned; final disposition and monetary terms undisclosed in available reporting.
Moreno's former employer and mentor, dealership magnate Herb Chambers, sued him in 2005 alleging he misappropriated confidential company data and poached customers in violation of a confidentiality agreement after leaving to start his own dealership; the previously unreported case reportedly ended in a settlement that was later overturned.
Sources: cleveland.com
resolvedCivil Lawsuit — Falcone v. Bernie Moreno / Porsche North Olmsted (Withheld Profit-Sharing Compensation, Alleged Altered Termination Document) business
financial/corruption · 2014-01-01 · Michael Falcone, hired in 2012 as general sales manager of a Moreno-owned Porsche dealership in North Olmsted, Ohio, sued Moreno in 2014 after being terminated. Falcone alleged Moreno had promised him $80,000 in base pay plus a 5% commission on the dealership's total variable gross profit, but never paid the promised commission despite repeated requests for sales documentation to verify the calculations. Falcone further alleged that after he pressed for the compensation, management demoted him from general manager to used-car manager, stripped his responsibilities, and ultimately terminated him in January 2014. He also alleged his termination paperwork was altered after he signed it — with a "permanent reduction in force" designation whited out and replaced with a designation citing unsatisfactory performance — without his knowledge or consent. Moreno and Falcone settled the case out of court in March 2016; settlement terms, including any monetary amount, were not disclosed. · Settled out of court in March 2016; terms confidential/undisclosed.
A former general sales manager at a Moreno-owned Porsche dealership sued Moreno in 2014 alleging unpaid profit-sharing commissions, retaliatory demotion and termination, and post-signature alteration of his termination document; the case settled out of court in 2016 on undisclosed terms.
settledDiscrimination Civil Lawsuit Settlements — BMC / Bernie Moreno Companies (Cuyahoga County) business
ethics-violation · 2015-01-01 · Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio · Three discrimination lawsuits (gender, racial, and age/gender) were filed against Moreno's dealership group and settled out of court on confidential terms. No court found liability; cases resolved by settlement.
The Associated Press found three employment discrimination lawsuits filed against Bernie Moreno Companies (BMC) in Cuyahoga County between 2015 and 2017 alleging gender discrimination, racial discrimination with wrongful termination, and combined age and gender discrimination against a senior saleswoman. All three were settled out of court under confidential terms; no court adjudicated liability.
final judgmentCivil Judgment for Unpaid Overtime — Adem v. M11 Motors LLC / Bernardo Moreno business
financial/corruption · 2017-01-01 · Middlesex County Superior Court, Massachusetts (Justice Michael Ricciuti) · Jury verdict against defendants; court ordered Moreno to pay $416,160 to two former employees (Omar Adem and a second salesperson) for unpaid overtime wages, including damages and attorney fees.
In 2017, former Mercedes-Benz Burlington (M11 Motors LLC) salesperson Omar Adem and a second employee sued Moreno's company for failure to pay overtime wages required under Massachusetts law. A jury found for the plaintiffs and the court entered a judgment of $416,160 covering unpaid overtime, treble damages, and legal fees. Moreno publicly disputed the verdict and characterized the state law as retroactively applied, a claim fact-checkers rated false.
sanction imposedCourt Sanction for Spoliation of Evidence — M11 Motors / Moreno Overtime Litigation business
obstruction-perjury · 2020-01-01 · Middlesex County Superior Court, Massachusetts (Justice Michael Ricciuti) · Justice Ricciuti sanctioned Moreno for destroying overtime pay records during pending litigation. The court issued an adverse inference instruction permitting the jury to infer that the destroyed evidence was damaging to Moreno's defense.
While the overtime wage litigation (Adem v. M11 Motors) was pending, Moreno admitted in a May 2021 deposition that he had destroyed paper monthly reports containing overtime data in late 2020 — records the court had implicitly required him to preserve. Justice Ricciuti formally sanctioned the defendants, writing that 'where negligently or intentionally, the Defendants lost or destroyed evidence that they were required to preserve,' and instructed the jury it could draw an adverse inference against Moreno from the missing evidence.