check.republican

← roster

JS

Josh Stein

DemocratGovernor of North Carolina
Age59 (b. 1966-09-13)
GenderMale
In office since2025-01-01 (~1 yrs)
Race / ethnicityWhite (Jewish American)
ReligionJewish (Reform Judaism); member of Temple Beth Or, Raleigh
EducationChapel Hill High School; B.A. in History, Dartmouth College (1988); J.D. and Master of Public Policy, Harvard University (Harvard Law School and Harvard Kennedy School)
Prior occupationLawyer; taught high school English and economics in Zimbabwe for two years after college; worked on affordable housing/community development lending; Senior Deputy Attorney General for Consumer Protection at the NC Department of Justice (2001-2008); of counsel at Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP (2012-2016); earlier deputy chief of staff to U.S. Senator John Edwards
Military serviceNo
BirthplaceWashington, D.C.
Marital statusmarried — Anna Harris Stein
Children3
ResidenceRaleigh, North Carolina
Notable relativesFather Adam Stein, prominent civil rights attorney who partnered with Julius Chambers and James Ferguson at North Carolina's first racially integrated law firm (Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Becton); the firm litigated Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Mother Jane Stein, liberal activist.

Pending research: languages · openly lgbtq.

Career & politics

First elected2008
Previous officesNorth Carolina State Senator, 16th District (2009-2016) · Attorney General of North Carolina, 51st (2017-2025)
LeadershipNorth Carolina Senate Minority Whip (as state senator) · Governor of North Carolina (76th, 2025-present)
IdeologyDemocrat; throughout his career aligned with mainstream/progressive Democratic positions (supported the Affordable Care Act, abortion access, clean energy). No DW-NOMINATE score (state/executive official, not member of Congress).
Signature legislationAs Attorney General: cleared North Carolina's backlog of untested sexual assault (rape) kits · As Attorney General: led/helped negotiate national opioid settlements (NC's share ~$1.5 billion) · As Attorney General: first state AG to sue e-cigarette maker Juul (2019), winning settlements · As Attorney General: negotiated the multistate Anti-Robocall Principles

Financial

No holdings recorded yet (from official Financial Disclosure filings).

Scandals & crimes ledger

resolved - no charges filed / case closedWake County grand jury presentment over 2020 campaign ad (criminal libel statute); no charges filed
campaign-finance · 2020-10 · Wake County (NC) District Attorney's Office / Wake County grand jury; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · A Wake County grand jury issued a presentment on August 22, 2022 naming Attorney General Josh Stein, his chief of staff Seth Dearmin, and his 2020 campaign manager Eric Stern, recommending possible indictment under a 1931 North Carolina statute (N.C.G.S. 163-274) criminalizing knowingly false derogatory statements about candidates. Stein's campaign committee sued in federal court arguing the law was unconstitutional. On August 23-24, 2022 a Fourth Circuit panel blocked enforcement, and on February 8, 2023 a unanimous Fourth Circuit panel ruled the law was likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment. On February 9, 2023, Wake County DA Lorrin Freeman closed the investigation; no indictment was ever returned and no charges were filed. A federal judge later entered an order ending the matter as moot.
Stein's 2020 campaign ad (titled 'Survivor') stated that his opponent, Forsyth County DA Jim O'Neill, 'left 1,500 rape kits on a shelf, leaving rapists on the streets.' O'Neill filed a complaint alleging the ad violated a rarely used 1931 criminal libel law barring knowingly false statements about candidates. After an SBI investigation, a Wake County grand jury issued a presentment in August 2022 recommending possible indictment of Stein and two campaign aides. Stein challenged the statute as unconstitutional. The Fourth Circuit blocked enforcement and held the law was likely unconstitutional; the district attorney then closed the case. No one was ever indicted or charged. This is included because a grand jury (an official body) took formal action (a presentment) and a federal appeals court formally adjudicated the matter, though it ended without charges.